25 Jun 2012

Large-Scale Foreign Investment on Lands: Boon or Bane?

Large-Scale Foreign Investment on Lands: Boon or Bane?

A PRIMER ON LARGE-SCALE FOREIGN INVESTMENT ON LANDS

Written by Reggie Aquino

This Policy Brief is issued by the People's Campaign for Agrarian Reform Network (AR Now!) and Kaisahan Tungo sa Kaunlaran ng Kanayunan at Repormang Pansakahan (KAISAHAN) to present and explain these global phenomena known as Large-Scale Foreign Investment on Lands.   This paper also underscores the need to institute mechanisms to safeguard the interests of Filipino citizens, especially the marginalized sectors, as well as to protect the environment from whatever adverse impact these may cause.

What are Large-Scale Foreign Investment on Lands?

Large-scale foreign investments on lands are massive (trans)national commercial land transactions (Borras, Hall, Scoones, & White, 2011) ranging from private-private purchases and public-private leases for biofuel production to acquisition of large parcels of land for conservation arrangements with varying outcomes (Hall, 2011).   Some of these lands have been cleared of existing inhabitants and users but not yet put into production.   In many cases, buyers and investors are simply preparing for the next global crisis (Borras, Hall, Scoones, & White, 2011, p. 209).

What is the Global Context?

The international frenzy for land was driven by the recent global economic crisis, the food price hike which heightened in 2007-2008, the increasing mandated demand for biofuels in many countries, and the inescapable effects of climate change which have added to the demand for land for agricultural production for food, energy, and carbon credits (Bernabe, 2010).

Powerful (trans)national economic actors from corporations to national governments and private equity funds are in constant search for "idle" lands often in South countries for fuel and food production (Borras, Hall, Scoones, & White, 2011, p. 209).

According to the International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI), the global estimate on large-scale foreign land investments reached about 20 million hectares (von Braun, 2009).   In another report, the World Bank placed the figure at 45 million hectares (World Bank report 2010 quoted on Borras, Hall, Scoones, & White, 2011). Most of the lands are in Africa, Latin America, and Southeast Asia, and lands already owned by rural communities under some tenure systems, although sometimes unregistered.   Oftentimes, States consider "idle" lands as available for disposal to foreign investors. However, although these lands may be underused, very little is not owned, vacant, or unused (Liversage, 2010).

This phenomenon is, however, not limited to agricultural lands as it can also be found in coastal areas and ancestral domains of indigenous peoples. In effect, such land investments take away the control of small producers over their resources to commercial uses, leading to hunger, poverty, and displacement.

What are the Current Issues Concerning Large-Scale Foreign Investment on Lands in the Philippines?

Although, some studies show that such investment on lands somehow benefits the communities, the rewards, if any, are mostly short-term. By and large, studies assert that the incursion of such foreign investments unduly exposes the marginalized sectors- the farmers, fisherfolk, and indigenous peoples - to threat of displacement and loss of control and ownership over and possession of their lands.

What Laws and Policies Govern Large-Scale Investment on Lands in the Philippines?

Despite the existence of these laws and regulatory policies governing large-scale investments on land, the rights of marginalized communities who are party to the deals still remain unprotected.   Loopholes render the regulatory powers of these laws ineffective and insufficient to regulate such investments.

What are the Types of Investment Deals on land in the Philippines?

DAR AO 9 Series of 2006 identified a number of Agribusiness Venture Agreements (AVA) between Agrarian Reform Beneficiaries (ARBs) and the Private Sector.   The same AO defined AVAs as an entrepreneurial collaboration between ARBs and investors to implement an agribusiness venture involving lands distributed under CARP.   AVAs include the following:

    1. Joint Venture Agreements (JVAs) - CARP Beneficiaries and investors form a joint venture corporation (JVC) to manage farm operations.   The beneficiaries contribute the use of the land held individually or in common and the facilities and improvements if any.   On the other hand, the investor furnishes capital and technology for the production, processing, and marketing of agricultural goods, or construction, rehabilitation, upgrading, and operation of agricultural capital assets, infrastructure facilities;
    2. Production/Contract Growing/Growership/Marketing contracts - ARBs commit to produce certain crops which the investor buys at pre-arranged terms (e.g., volume, quality standards, selling price).   This may come in the form of production and processing agreements;
    3. Lease Agreement - ARBs bind themselves to give the former landowner or any other investor maximum control over the use and management of the land for a certain amount and for a definite period;
    4. Management Contract - ARBs hire the services of a contractor who may be an individual, partnership or corporation to assist in the management and operation of the farm for the purpose of producing high-value crops or other agricultural crops in exchange for a fixed wage and/or commission;
    5. Service Contract - ARBs engage the services of a contractor for mechanized land preparation, cultivation, harvesting, processing, post-harvest operations, and/or other farm activities for a fee;
    6. Build-Operate-Transfer (BOT) - The investor builds, rehabilitates or upgrades, at his own cost, capital assets, infrastructure, and facilities applied to the production, processing, and marketing of agricultural products and operates the same at his expense for an agreed period after the ownership thereof is conveyed to the ARBs who own the land where such improvements and facilities are located.

The Fisheries Code of 1998 and Fisheries Administrative Order No. 197 Series of 2000 provide the rules and regulations governing the lease of public lands for fishpond development.

Fishpond Lease - An agreement entered into by and between the Secretary of Agriculture and qualified fishpond applicant for the use of public land for fishpond development purposes for a period of twenty-five (25) years.

A Mineral Agreement is an agreement between a Contractor and the Government wherein the State grants to the Contractor the exclusive right to conduct mining operations within, but not title over, the contract area. Mining operations that are allowed under Mineral Agreements include development/construction and utilization of mineral resources including the continuance of exploration works during the conduct of development/construction/ utilization activities. Mineral Agreements are classified into:

    1. Mineral Production Sharing Agreement (MPSA)  - A mineral agreement wherein the Government shares in the production of the Contractor, whether in kind or in value, as an owner of the minerals. In return, the Contractor shall provide the necessary financing, technology, management, and personnel for the mining project;
    2. Co-Production Agreement (CA) - A mineral agreement wherein the Government provides inputs to the mining operations other than the mineral resources; and
    3. Joint Venture Agreement (JVA) - A mineral agreement wherein the Government and the Contractor organize a joint venture company with both parties having equity shares. For its share, the Government is entitled to a share in the gross output of the mining project aside from its earnings in the equity of the company.

Under the SEZ Act of 1995, Ecozones may contain any or all of the following:

    1. Industrial Estate or a tract of land subdivided and developed according to a comprehensive plan under a unified continuous management and with provisions for basic infrastructure and utilities, with or without pre-built standard factory buildings and community facilities for the use of the community and of industries;
    2. Export Processing Zone (EPZ) or a specialized industrial estate located physically and/or administratively outside customs territory, predominantly oriented to export production. Enterprises located in export processing zones are allowed to import capital equipment and raw materials free from duties, taxes and other import restrictions;
    3. Free Trade Zone or an isolated policed area adjacent to a port of entry (as a seaport) and/or airport where imported goods may be unloaded for immediate transhipment or stored, repacked, sorted, mixed, or otherwise manipulated without being subject to import duties. However, movement of these imported goods from the free-trade area to a non-free-trade area in the country shall be subject to import duties.

Enterprises within the zone are granted preferential tax treatment and immigration laws are more lenient.

DENR Administrative Order No.   99-34 enshrines the guidelines for Foreshore Lease Contract (FLC), an agreement between the Department of Environment and Natural Resources (DENR) covering foreshore lands, marshy lands, and lands bordering bodies of water for commercial, industrial, and other productive uses other than agriculture.

Why is there a Need to Pass a Bill to Monitor and Regulate Large-Scale Foreign Investment on Lands?

The gravity of the issues concerning large-scale foreign investment on lands, the current influx of such investments in the country, and the lack of regulatory measures to govern them and effectively protect the rights and interests of Filipinos, especially the marginalized groups, sufficiently justifies the need for an appropriate and effective law.   For these reasons, a bill called An Act Regulating Foreign Large-Scale Investment on Lands, "Regulation on Large-Scale Foreign Investment Act", is being proposed.

What are the Objectives of the Proposed Large-Scale Foreign Investment Act?

 What are the Salient Provisions of the Bill?

The bill provides a clear definition of what constitutes large-scale foreign investment on lands taking the local context into account. Large-Scale Foreign Investment on Lands is the leasing, acquisition, or use of land exceeding an aggregate area of 5 hectares in the Philippines by foreign entities; or entering into a joint venture agreement, partnership, cooperation, or similar business agreements where the control or the beneficial use of land with an aggregate area exceeding 5 hectares is given to the foreign entity.

Mechanisms for participation and gathering the position of affected sectors and communities shall be conducted.   It involves giving notice of hearing/consultation to affected sectors and communities through publication or posting in conspicuous places, the conduct of a reasonable number of hearings and solicitation of positions, and the public presentation and validation of the planning results before the final adoption of the plans.

The bill likewise identifies the foreign investment deals on land which shall be covered by the proposed measure. Specifically, it will include all contracts, agreements, negotiations, talks, and deals involving foreign investment on land exceeding an aggregate of 5 hectares shall be publicly disclosed.   It shall be approved by the National Regulatory Board on Foreign Land Investments before it is legally implemented.   The regulation covers all investment deals on land between:

Establishment of a Regulatory Board to Govern Foreign Investments on Land

A National Regulatory Board will be created for the purpose of regulating Foreign Investment on Lands. The Board which will be under the Office of the President and shall have the power to approve or disapprove large-scale foreign investment agreements on land, based on the guidelines it will formulate.

 It shall also create its own Secretariat, and formulate its own organizational plan, staffing pattern, and internal rules.

The minimum lease rental shall be computed based on the formula set by the Board and shall be incorporated in the terms and conditions of the lease agreement.

The Board shall undertake an inventory of all lands targeted for large-scale foreign investment in the Philippines within six (6) months after the passage of the Act.

A Congressional Oversight Committee will be established in order to monitor the performance of the Board and to propose legislative actions in relation to foreign land grabbing.

 What are the Underlying Principles for Approval of Large-Scale Foreign Investment on Lands?

In line with these principles, the bill provides:

What is the Composition of the National Regulatory Board on Foreign Investment on Lands?

The Board shall be composed of the following:

A Board Chairperson will be appointed by the President for a term of 3 years from among the nominees to be submitted by the National Anti-Poverty Commission (NAPC).   The basic sector representatives shall serve a term of 3 years.   The other members of the Board shall have concurrent terms with their position.

-

WORKS CITED

Bernabe, R. (2010). Private Sector Agricultural Land Investments: Impacts on Small Men and Women and on Food Security. Quezon City, Philippines: Oxfam Great Britain.

Borras, S. J., Hall, R., Scoones, I., & White, B. a. (2011). Towards a Better Understanding of Global Land Grabbing: An Editorial Introduction. The Journal of Peasant Studies, Volume 38 Issue 2, 2011, 209-216.

Calvan, D. a. (2011). Retrieved December 2011, from http://www.landcoalition.org: http://www.landcoalition.org/sites/default/files/publication/1019/NFR_fisheries_web_11.03.11.pdf

Hall, R. (2011). The Many Faces of the Investor Rush in Southern Africa: Towards a Typology of Commercial Land Deals. ICAS Working Paper Series, Vol. No. 2, The HAgue: International Institute of Social Studies (ISS).

Liversage, H. (2010, December). Responding to "Land Grabbing" and Promoting Responsible Investment in Agriculture. IFAD Occasional Paper 2 . International Fund for Agricultural Development.

von Braun, J. (2009, April). von Braun, Joachim; Meinzin-Dick,Ruth. "Land Grabbing" by Foreign Investors in Developing Countries: Risks and Opportunities, Policy Brief 13. International Food Policy Research Institute.

World Bank report 2010 quoted on Borras, S. J., Hall, R., Scoones, I., & White, B. a. (2011). Journal of Peasant Studies, Volume 38 Issue 2, 2011. Towards a Better Understanding of Global Land Grabbing: An Editorial Introduction. Taylor and Francis Online.

Share on: